Build in Public Day 2: Market Validation — Is This Problem Widespread?

Having one person's pain is a start. Having an industry-wide pattern is a business.

Yesterday I extracted a structured understanding of a real problem from a real customer conversation. Today, the question is whether that problem is widespread enough to build a business around.

Going Deeper with Claude

I opened a new chat in the same Claude project — which means it already has all the context from Day 1. My prompt asked Claude to research how widespread billing and time-tracking problems are across the legal services industry. I directed it toward forums, Reddit, Quora, and anywhere else lawyers and law firm owners discuss their operational challenges.

Critically, I didn't bias the AI toward our problem. I asked it to identify the top five problems in the industry and see whether ours appeared on the list. I wanted honest signal, not confirmation bias.

The Results

The findings were striking. Time tracking and billing came in not just within the top five, but arguably in the top two or three. The data showed firms losing anywhere from 10 to 50 percent of their billable revenue — a dramatic number. Even a small dent in that loss would make a huge impact.

The top challenges it identified were client acquisition and retention (always number one in every industry), economic pressure (not much we can do about that), and time tracking and billing (that's us). The percentage of firms affected: 20 to 55 percent — the widest range and highest numbers on the entire list.

The Emotional Signal

Claude surfaced quotes from real attorneys talking about billing on forums. The language was emotionally charged — exactly what you want to see. The standout: "Billing can kiss my entire ass." That's not mild inconvenience. That's the kind of frustration people will pay real money to eliminate.

These quotes are gold for future landing page copy. When your target market describes their pain in language that strong, you're looking at a genuine business opportunity.

The Competitive Landscape

Without even being asked, Claude surfaced the competitive landscape. Clio has raised nearly a billion dollars. Several other funded players are in the space, many targeting enterprise-sized firms with premium pricing.

This is good news, not bad news. Funded competitors mean the market is validated. Money is flowing toward solving this problem. The question isn't whether the opportunity exists — it's whether the existing solutions are solving it well enough. Based on forum sentiment: they're not. Customers of billion-dollar companies are still complaining about billing.

The Three-Question Validation Test

Based on today's research, I can now answer three critical questions. Is this problem in the top five for our target audience? Yes — it's top three. Is there quantifiable impact? Yes — 10 to 50 percent of billable revenue. Are competitors raising money to solve it? Yes — hundreds of millions of dollars. If you can answer yes to all three, you likely have a validated idea.

Your Takeaway

Take your interview insights and validate them at scale with AI. Create a new chat in the same Claude project so it has your Day 1 context. Ask it to research forums, Reddit, and industry discussions. Don't bias it — ask for the top five problems and see if yours makes the list. Look for emotional language, quantifiable impact, and funded competitors still failing to solve the problem.

Next in the series: Day 3 — Competitive Deep Dive. We map every competitor's strengths, weaknesses, and gaps.

Start the free 5-day email course

Watch the Build in Public Series on YouTube